Comparing two ETFs in the same sector it seems that all the buzz is around TAN, but after some deeper research, it looks like QCLN is stronger overall. I come to this conclusion because * 1 - It's lower expense ratio than TAN * 2 - It's top ten holdings are stronger than TAN's * 3 - Performance over the past 5 years better than TAN
Does anyone know why Guggenheim gets so much attention? QCLN seems clearly a better investment.
Thoughts?
Submitted December 08, 2014 at 10:58PM by 1noahone http://ift.tt/1G8xdgQ
No comments:
Post a Comment